What makes wood water towers more cost-effective compared to steel towers?

The reason that wood water towers are generally more cost-effective compared to steel towers is primarily due to their construction and maintenance costs. Wood is often less expensive than steel, making the initial building of a wood tower less costly. Additionally, maintenance for wood towers can be simpler and less costly over time because wood can be more versatile and easier to repair than steel, which may require specialized welding and anti-corrosive treatments.

While lighter weight can play a role in certain contexts, it is not the primary reason for cost-effectiveness in this comparison. Furthermore, the amount of water a tower holds is not inherently tied to the material it is made from, nor is the longevity of wood typically greater than that of steel. Thus, the economic advantages of wood in terms of construction and ongoing maintenance significantly contribute to its cost-effectiveness in the context of water towers.